patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!
Local Voices
Transportation safety consultant and advocate, hockey and teen driver mom, and avid reader.

Who’s Job Is It to Ensure Passengers are Buckled Up?

It’s universally accepted that seat belts save lives.  In fact, data show that in the event of a motor vehicle crash, serious injury to properly restrained occupants is reduced by as much as 75 percent.  So why do some individuals still insist on not buckling up?

“I don’t want to be told to buckle up!” “Sometimes I just forget to put my seat belt on.”  “I know someone who was injured by a seat belt so I’m safer not wearing one.”  I typically hear these excuses when I speak publicly about the issue.  But it’s hard to argue with the facts -- since Congress enacted the National Traffic and Motor Vehicle Safety Act of 1966, which called for the installation of lap belts in cars, thousands of lives have been saved and hundreds of thousands of serious injuries prevented.

I bring up the issue of seat belts because in mid-August, the New Jersey Appellate Division ruled that the failure of a driver to make sure that a minor passenger is properly using a seat belt can support a prosecution for the crime of knowingly failing to perform a duty imposed by law intended to protect public safety.  Under N.J.S.A. 2C:40-18, a motorist can be charged with a crime of between the fourth and second degree, depending upon the extent of the injuries sustained by the unbelted victim.

The particular case, State v. Lenihan, involved an 18-year-old defendant who was operating a motor vehicle with a 16-year-old passenger in the front seat.  Neither was wearing a seat belt when the driver crashed.  Both occupants were seriously injured and the minor passenger died several days later.  Under New Jersey’s seat belt law (N.J.S. A. 39:3-76.2), the driver is responsible for ensuring that all passengers under 18 are properly restrained.  Based upon this requirement, the defendant was indicted for a violation of 2C:40-18.

The Appellate Court ruled that the seat belt law in New Jersey is broadly intended to protect not only motor vehicle occupants, but the public’s health and safety.  It’s clear the Court’s ruling has wide and significant implications for drivers who don’t take their duty to ensure all minor passengers are properly restrained seriously.

Which leads me to my second reason for writing about this issue.  Despite being a generation that has grown up with seat belts, today’s teens and young adults aren’t particularly good about buckling up.  According to the latest Fairleigh Dickinson University PublicMind Poll, commissioned by the New Jersey Division of Highway Traffic Safety, just 83 percent of young drivers, regularly buckle up. That number remains unchanged from 2011 and is an 8 percent drop from 2010. Young people according to the poll are also 11 percent less likely -- regardless of seating position -- to use their seat belts when riding as passengers in motor vehicles.

I find these statistics particularly troubling since car crashes are the number one killer of teens and teens are mile for mile four times more likely any another other age group on the road to crash. Ensuring that teen drivers buckle up is critical for their own safety.  But teens and young adults must also understand that as the vehicle operator, it is it their responsibility to ensure that all of their passengers are properly restrained as well.

If a passenger is between 8 and 17 years of age, he must ride in a seat belt which includes a properly placed shoulder harness (across the chest, not behind the back).  If the passenger is a child of car or booster seat age (NJ requires all children under 8 years of age or 80 pounds to ride in the appropriate child safety seat), he must ride in one of those devices as well. If not, the driver may be issued a ticket for failing to properly secure his passengers and, in the event of crash, be held liable if his passengers are injured.

What if the passenger(s) is 18 years of age or older?  The driver should still ensure that everyone is buckled up and refuse to start the car if all passengers don’t comply.  If the driver is stopped by a police officer and an adult passenger is unbelted, the passenger, not the driver, may be cited for the seat belt violation.

The bottom line here is that parents must impress upon all new drivers (and be positive role models as well) that it’s their responsibility to ensure their passengers are properly restrained under the provisions of New Jersey’s seat belt and child restraint laws.  It’s not enough to buckle their own seat belt; they’re responsible for minor passengers as well.

bbbnto

2:36 pm on Friday, September 14, 2012

Pam, I like your column very much and it certainly is helpful for people who have young drivers. But there is something that is rarely addressed, and that is elderly drivers. It appears, based on recent articles, that there are a lot more elderly drivers getting into accidents. In Caldwell within the past couple of years, there have been elderly drivers crashing into buildings on Bloomfield Ave. I've read that there were older drivers accidently stepping on the gas pedal instead of the brakes, and hitting a group of people, and then within the last couple of days in Chatham, the car that an 83 year old driver was stopped by police for not yielding to a pedestrian, accidently rolled backards into the police car that pulled her over.

Now, I can appreciate the problems dealing with elderly drivers. They have, and rightfully should be, treated with respect. But how do you tell an older individual, especially a father or mother, that it's no longer safe for them to drive? I believe there should be some type of testing that older drivers should have to take...but once again, how do you fairly do this? This is a subject that needs to be addressed sooner than later.

Your column deals with younger drivers, which deserves a great deal of attention, and you're doing an excellent job addressing. Perhaps your knowledge of problems with young drivers can also be applied to our older generation of drivers.

Reply

Pam Fischer

8:20 pm on Friday, September 14, 2012

While my blog focuses on teen drivers, I do make every effort to connect the info to all drivers as much as possible . Earlier this year (March 6), I addressed the issue of older drivers in my blog, having just visited with my retired parents. Here's the

link:http://caldwells.patch.com/blog_posts/focusing-on-older-driver-safety-can-benefit-us-all-e1c97c84

While older drivers are in the news, I must point out that teens still have the highest crask risk of any age group on the road (4xs greater). Older drivers, when they do crash, are more likely to be seriously injured or killed.

Reply

Leave a comment