patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Freeholder Race Comes Down to Wire

In District 4, Democrat Len Luciano declares victory, Republican Joseph Chiusolo says not so fast.

 

Editor's Note: For an updated version of this story, click here.

Updated 1:20 a.m.

With more than 99 percent of the vote counted, Democrat Len Luciano appeared to be beating Republican Joseph Chiusolo by just 230 votes, or less than 1 percent in the race for District 4 Freeholder.

The results are so close, that tallies may not be known until morning. The final result will not be official until certified by the Essex County Clerk's office.

While Luciano declared victory and thanked his supporters, Chiusolo, the deputy mayor of Cedar Grove, said it wasn't over yet, "It's a horse race. For me to declare victory or concede would be wrong at this point. Now it's a waiting game. It may be something that's challenged, we don't know what's going to happen at this point and it's too soon to say. It's my fight to win, which I'm confident I will."

However, Luciano, of West Caldwell, who is currently acting District 4 Freeholder, declared victory, saying he "couldn't be happier" with the result,"I want to thank the voters for electing me to serve a full three-year term. I pledge to work diligently on behalf of all the voters of District 4."

As of 11:52 p.m. on the Essex County Clerk website, Luciano remained ahead with 12,822 votes, or 50.43 percent. Chiusolo trailed slightly with 12,592, or 49.53 percent.

Luciano, in a telephone interview, offered praise to his opponent, with whom he had sparred during the contentious campaign, calling him "a viable and respected opponent."

"I'd like to thank Joe for giving voters in District 4 a choice," he said.

However, Chiusolo said the results were too close to declare victory or concede defeat. Chiusolo noted that in the districts that have so far reported results, he had won every town except Caldwell, which he says he lost by a three-vote margin.

It was a hard-fought contest between Chiusolo and Luciano, and an explosive confrontation at the end of a debate at Verona High School last month solidified the match-up as one to watch.

During the campaign, Chiusolo said spending by the county is "out of control", citing recent multimillion dollar projects undertaken by the county at the South Mountain Recreation Complex in West Orange, including a Big Cat zoo exhibit, a mini-golf safari and a Boathouse Restaurant opened late last month.

Luciano defended county spending projects as job-creating revenue generators which draw people to work, live and play in Essex County.

Republican insiders had said Chiusolo had a real chance to break into the Democrat-dominated Freeholder Board. If he emerges victorious when the election night dust settles, Chiusolo would be the first Republican to serve on the Freeholder Board since 2005.

District 4, geographically the largest Freeholder district in Essex County, encompasses Caldwell, Cedar Grove, West Caldwell, North Caldwell, Essex Fells, Fairfield, Livingston, Millburn, West Orange, Roseland and Verona.

Don

12:16 am on Wednesday, November 9, 2011

Regardless which one wins I think they need to proceed with an eye to trying to address the problems faced by the entire county - obviously government spending and the awarding of contracts is a red flag issue that needs to be opened up to a great deal more citizen input than has been customary in the recent past. The global economy is in free fall, and we don't live on an island, we are part of it. We should assume the worst may happen in the future, incomes are falling substantially. We need to do everything we can to save money and be open to every suggestion that might help. If the winner understands that, they should be able to handle the situation - with help from the community.

Reply

Don

12:21 am on Wednesday, November 9, 2011

Unfortunately, with the Sequoia AVC Advantage voting machines the state purchased, there is not a voter verifiable paper trail, and the election totals can be manipulated. So, I guess we are on the honor system until they are replaced with legal machines (under NJ law, the Sequoia AVC Advantage machines are not legal, if I understand the numerous lawsuits correctly.

http://arstechnica.com/software/news/2008/10/study-sequoia-e-voting-machines-disturbingly-easy-to-hack.ars

Center for Information Technology Policy: Insecurities and Inaccuracies of the Sequoia AVC Advantage 9.00H DRE Voting Machine:
http://citp.princeton.edu/voting/advantage/

(Also see the dozens of other links I posted earlier...)

Reply
Comment_arrow

bbbnto

1:39 am on Wednesday, November 9, 2011

Don,
Do you live in NewJersey?

When you vote, you have to go to the table and sign your name. Then, they give you a piece of paper with your name on it. You proceed to the voting booth, paper in hand. Before you enter the booth, a person takes the paper and 'pierces' it on a cable that 'hangs' next to the booth. I imagine they do this so they can veryify the total votes tallyed by the machine, against the total pieces of paper. This is overseen by at least two challengers, at least one Republican person and at least one Democratic person. And I think that the counts in the machine must match the pieces of paper hanging there. There would have to be a mass conspiricy by people of both politcal parties to illegally sway a vote one way or the other. This is the way it's been done since I've been voting.

A couple of years ago, they changed the machines and made them electronic vs. the old mechanical machines. But the paper is still required to go into the voting booth to cast your vote.

I am by no means an expert - just a casual observer - but it's obvious there are checks to the process.

Maybe my observations are see through naive eyes, so please explain what you're talking about.

Comment_arrow

M OKeef

6:26 am on Wednesday, November 9, 2011

bbnto -- the process you described would show number of votes cast -- not who the votes were cast for...I think Don is looking for a paper trail of who each vote was cast for.

Martin

10:18 am on Wednesday, November 9, 2011

Someone Professor or student from Princeton or New Jersey City University, I don't care who, just get the bug fixed. This will take about a week for the recount to be done at the minimum. Then it can go to court for a bit too.

Reply

Martin

10:45 am on Wednesday, November 9, 2011

Sad isn't it this is now above the late Al Hague's caliber of rigging an election...

Reply

Leave a comment